Cristiano Ronaldo is still alien to the La Liga scoring, and has failed to score Bilbao tonight.
به روز باشیم
!—>
Sunday, December 3, 2017
Monday, November 27, 2017
A spectacular picture of Golshifteh Farahani alongside his sister's son, Shaghayegh Farahani
Golshifteh Farahani congratulated the birth of his sister's son Shaghayegh Farahani.
The difference between height is too much Elnaz Shakerdoost and Amir Jafari! Picture
The
difference between the height of El Naz Shakerdoost alongside Amir
Jafari is one of the subjects of the new show that they are the main
actors.
Sunday, November 26, 2017
Photographs by Negin Mirasali Manekan, a resident of the Netherlands
Negin Mirasali, 2013 Best
Female Blogger in Europe. Negin Mir Salehi, along with his specialized
workshops, is renowned for his fashion and fashion affiliation with some
companies to promote their products as models. Genghine Mir Salehi in
2014 with a friend He married his Dutch son.
Saturday, November 25, 2017
The most important thing to know about innovation
One of the most often told stories about innovation is that of Alexander Fleming and his discovery of penicillin.
Returning after a summer holiday in 1928, the solitary Scottish
scientist noticed that a strange mold had contaminated the bacteria
cultures he was growing. That single observation would change the world.
At least, that's how the story is usually told. What really happened
is that when Fleming published his findings, no one really noticed
because what he discovered couldn't have cured anyone. It wasn't until a
decade later that his paper was unearthed by another group of
scientists who engineered it into the miracle cure we know today.
The truth is that the next big thing always starts out looking like nothing at all
because it arrives out of context. In other words, great innovations
not only change the world, the world changes them and while that's in
progress, no one really knows how things will turn out. That's what
nobody tells you about innovation. To do it well you need to learn to
live in a state of confusion.
The 30 Years Rule
Penicillin's long gestation -- it wasn't made commercially available
until 1946 -- is more the rule than the exception. In fact, the truth is
that its time to market was greatly shortened because the US government
ordered more than two dozen pharmaceutical companies to begin
manufacturing the drug for the war effort.
Electricity and the internal combustion engine took even longer.
Although the initial technologies were developed in the in the early
1880's, widespread adoption and economic impact didn't come until the
1920s. It took that long for things like infrastructure, and
complimentary technologies to build up and for new practices to arise
that made use of new capabilities.
Although we tend to think that things move much faster today, the
path from discovery to productivity doesn't seem to have shortened. It
wasn't till about thirty years after Douglas Engelbart's Mother of All Demos that personal computers started showing up in the productivity numbers. More recent advances, such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing and cancer immunotherapy follow similar timelines.
So innovation is never a single event, but usually takes about thirty years to move from discovery to engineering to transformation. That's just a rule of thumb, sometimes it can be longer or shorter, but we're talking decades, not months or years.
Unlikely Combinations
One reason that innovation takes so long is that lone technologies
rarely make much of an impact alone. Just as the automobile needed roads
and gas stations and electricity needed appliances, modern technologies
need an ecosystem of support in order to really change the world. After
all, what would an iPhone be without an app store?
Yet combinations also play an important role in discovery. In the
case of penicillin, one of the reasons why Fleming's discovery never
gained traction was that there was no way to produce enough of it to be
therapeutically effective. Part of the answer came in the form of corn steep liquor, a fermentation medium common in the American Midwest, but unheard of in England, where Fleming lived and worked.
Again, this is more the rule than the exception. In fact, in a study that analyzed 17.9 million scientific papers,
it was found most breakthroughs occur when conventional wisdom from one
field is combined with a smidgen of insight from some unlikely place.
It is often that small piece of information that breaks a logjam and
points to entirely new directions.
Innovation, at its core, is about combination.
The only way to break free of old paradigms is to continually seek out
new things and then merge, mix and incorporate those with things you
already know.
Exploring Unlikely Places
In researching my book, Mapping Innovation,
I talked to dozens of great innovators who were, in many ways, very
diverse. Some were outrageously successful executives and entrepreneurs.
Others were scientists who made breakthrough discoveries. Some were
funny and outgoing. Others were quiet and thoughtful. There didn't seem
to be one "type."
Yet one aspect of their personalities was amazingly common. Almost
all were tremendously nice and generous people who wanted to be helpful.
They were also intensely curious, asking me questions about myself and
my work. Often, I got the feeling that they were almost as interested in
me as I was about them.
When you think about it though, it begins to make sense. Innovation needs exploration.
The more you explore, the more likely you are to come across that
random smidgen of insight that will help you solve a problem. Being a
sharing person increases the amount of people who are willing to share
with you. Generosity can actually be a competitive advantage.
However, constantly searching and exploring takes you into unfamiliar
places where your knowledge and experience provide little guidance.
That can be uncomfortable, but it is also absolutely essential to coming
up with profoundly new ideas.
Transcending Uncertainty
One of my biggest heroes is the physicist Richard Feynman.
Besides the pathbreaking discoveries he made in his own field, he also
helped establish new fields such as nanotechnology, quantum computing
did important research in virology. Still though, he admitted that he
spend most of his time in a state of confusion.
Yet nobody ever seems to talk about that. We imagine great innovators
to be those with almost godlike powers of vision. We see Steve Jobs
standing on stage in triumph and rarely take note of his many failures
and missteps. Nobody ever talks about the pain of muddling through a
problem for years when it seems like an answer will never reveal itself.
That's a shame, because to do anything significant you have to muddle
through. If answers were easy to come by somebody else would already
have found them. Investors want predictability. Managers want results.
But great innovators learn to become comfortable with their own
limitations and live in a state of confusion, chipping away with no
guarantee of success.
That's how things move forward.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
The difference between the height of El Naz Shakerdoost alongside Amir Jafari is one of the subjects of the new show that they are the ...
-
Cristiano Ronaldo is still alien to the La Liga scoring, and has failed to score Bilbao tonight.
-
Golshifteh Farahani congratulated the birth of his sister's son Shaghayegh Farahani.